GER outcomes in your syllabus

General Education Requirements (GER) for baccalaureate degrees describe required courses that students must complete in order to achieve a bachelor’s degree. Here at UAF, GERs provide a common set of learning experiences for students and have outcomes that encapsulate the broad educational goals of a liberal arts college. Ideally, courses that fulfill the GER align their course outcomes with the broad GER outcomes. If you’re developing a new course, aligning your course outcomes with GER outcomes will go a long way in streamlining the course approval process.

Engaging GER outcomes in the course development process presents opportunities for creating activities/assessments that help students gain a broad base of knowledge of the natural, physical and civic world around them, develop skills to grow that knowledge, and become better critical thinkers capable of formulating ideas and communicating them to others.

If you’re not familiar with the outcomes for GER courses here at UAF, they are as follows:

  1. Build knowledge of human institutions, sociocultural processes, and the physical and natural world through the study of the natural and social sciences, technologies, mathematics, humanities, histories, languages and the arts.
    • Competence will be demonstrated for the foundational information in each subject area, its context and significance, and the methods used in advancing each.
  2. Develop intellectual and practical skills across the curriculum, including inquiry and analysis, critical and creative thinking, problem-solving, written and oral communication, information literacy, technological competence, and collaborative learning.
    • Proficiency will be demonstrated across the curriculum through critical analysis of proffered information, well-reasoned solutions to problems or inferences drawn from evidence, effective written and oral communication, and satisfactory outcomes of group projects.
  3. Acquire tools for effective civic engagement in local through global contexts, including ethical reasoning, intercultural competence, and knowledge of Alaska and Alaska issues.
    • Facility will be demonstrated through analyses of issues including dimensions of ethics, human and cultural diversity, conflicts and interdependencies, globalization and sustainability.
  4. Integrate and apply learning, including synthesis and advanced accomplishment across general and specialized studies, adapting them to new settings, questions and responsibilities, and forming a foundation for lifelong learning.
    • Preparation will be demonstrated through the production of a creative or scholarly product that requires broad knowledge, appropriate technical proficiency, information collection, synthesis, interpretation, presentation, and reflection.

To summarize the above learning outcomes succinctly, consider the following as crib notes:

  1. Build (Add to) Knowledge/Input
  2. Develop (Evaluate) Skills/Processing
  3. Engage/Action, Doing
  4. Transfer/Integrative Learning

GER outcomes are useful tools for developing classroom activities for courses that fulfill GER outcomes. Aligning your syllabus with broader institutional outcomes clearly articulates how the course reaches GER outcomes within your discipline. Practically, achievement of these outcomes can be assessed using Bloom’s taxonomy, or your favorite taxonomy guide, to determine lower- to higher-order skills demonstrated by students.

If you’re interested in a continuing conversation regarding GER outcomes or are interested in piloting a GER assessment tool for your course, contact Sarah Stanley and Zoe Jones.

Further reading

Jones, B. M., & Wehlburg, C. M. (2014). Learning Outcomes Assessment Misunderstood: Glass Half-Empty or Half-Full. Journal Of The National Collegiate Honors Council, 15(2), 15-23.

Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.

Bloom’s Taxonomy: Teacher Planning Kit (PDF)

More on learning taxonomies on CTL

A headshot of Christen Booth

Christen Booth

Creative Director
Instructional Designer
Google for Education Certified Trainer

cdbooth@alaska.edu

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *